uzumakijpeg:

there is literally nothing you can do to stop me from referring to myself as gay even though i’m pansexual, you cannot make “gay” the new face of the lgbtq+ community while simultaneously denying bi/pan/ace people recognition and then get mad when they use the only term available to them 

linnealurks:

abadplanwellexecuted:

oodlyenough:

moffatlove:

I sometimes wonder if people who prefer the Russell T Davies era ever actually watched it.

silly monsters?? on doctor who???????

well, i never

I watched the fuck out of these.  I’d watch the fuck out of them again.  They’re great episodes with great themes, ideas, and characterization. 

I love the greedy Slitheen (family name, not species, thank you) with their chubby green faces and cunning.  I love that they were both avid hunters AND successfully sneaky, the gas exchange problems aside.  (In fact, I love that flaw, ridiculous as it may be, because why the hell should villains carry out precision-perfect plans all the time?  Evil-doers who snap their fingers and have everything fall into place are using stupid, cheap Plot Powers.  The ones who have to hide in closets and panic over how much they’re farting — those ones I believe.)

I love that when we see one of them return toward the end of the season, we see her as more than just the wooden villain — someone lonely and grieving, selfish and lost.  I love the Doctor’s conversation with her:

MARGARET: You know I’m capable of better.

DOCTOR: It doesn’t mean anything.  

MARGARET: I spared her life.

DOCTOR: You let one of them go, but that’s nothing new. Every now and then, a little victim’s spared because she smiled, because he’s got freckles, because they begged. And that’s how you live with yourself. That’s how you slaughter millions. Because once in a while, on a whim, if the wind’s in the right direction, you happen to be kind.

MARGARET: Only a killer would know that.

That bit still gives me chills, years later.

I loved the altered pig creature, and the way the entire scene introducing it was set up — scary music, a terrifying rustling noise from somewhere in the room, and then the Doctor leans so-very-slowly around the edge of the counTER TO SEE THE ALIEN OHGAWDTHEALIEN—

and he smiles at it and says “hello.”

I love the Isolus, committing such a horrific crime in kidnapping children that you can’t help but imagine that it must be something truly terrible — but no, it’s just a frightened child.  Selfish, certainly, the way children are, and destructive, but not really evil.  I love the scribble “creature” it makes by mistake — another imperfect execution made by a realistic “bad guy”.  

I even love the ridiculous, horrifying, much-hated Absorbaloff (designed by a nine year old kid who won a contest).  I love his alter-ego, Victor Kennedy.  (“Back, back, all of you!  My ExEEEEMa!”)  He’s one of the few just-there-to-be-bad villains, but that’s because he’s not the point of the story.  I love the entire L&M plot because it’s about this group of people who all experienced hardship, tragedy, pain, etc., and so decided to try to find the Doctor but ended up finding each other.  I love the fact that most of them die in the end because life can be hard and the universe isn’t fair and terrible things happen to good people, but fuck it, while they lived, they made music and sculptures and poetry and food and found happiness and brought happiness to others.

I could go on and on and on, through pretty much every episode.  RTD’s stuff wasn’t the holy grail of all perfection (especially since that’s not actually a thing?), and there are valid critiques and criticisms of some of his choices (looking at you, naked Mark Gatiss), but dude.  Duuuude.  

It was fantastic. 

I’ll take strong plots and weak special effects over the opposite any day.

sadiesteel:

madamekotty:

glassmountain:

stfuconservatives:

nextyearsgirl:

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

^

(mic drop)

boom

THANK YOU

Exactly.